qerttags.blogg.se - Visualvm vs jprofiler

#Visualvm vs jprofiler full
#Visualvm vs jprofiler code

Those rates (runtime per 1000 executions and frequency), will be displayed in the report in parenthesis next to the cumulative global rates. In order to deal with such cases, the profiler supports an optional resetAfterSampleCount argument (0 by default), which will also calculate rates statistics for up to n last executions of each section. There are also cases, in a long-running application, where workloads/request content changes over time, for example, if the work to do is dependent on a data-structure that is growing gradually. Sometimes you want to exclude from profiling the first iterations of batch processing until everything is cached properly. Dealing with warm-up time and changing workloads It serves as a reference for what is 100% of run-time and by summing runtime of all nested sections, you may determine whether there are some other code-blocks which take significant run-time but are not enclosed in any section.

#Visualvm vs jprofiler full

This section ( total above) typically covers a full single iteration/request and all other sections are sub-sections of it. The profiler also supports an optional enclosing section. In the example output above, parser section includes both split, drain and mask section. Note that sections can overlap or be nested. (5) Frequency/Rate - Count of times this section can be executed in 1 second. (4) Average runtime of 1000 executions of this section. (3) Count of time this section was executed. (2) The contribution (in %) of this section to the total runtime.

#Visualvm vs jprofiler code

We can see a line per section, measuring: (1) The cumulative runtime of all code inside that section. You may call report() to get a profiling summary like this: The profiler will collect running-time statistics for this code block. Call the profiler’s start_section(section_name) before any code block you want to measure, and end_section() after the code block.

Your task probably runs in a loop or on a per-call basis. Some of the available profiling tools are commercial.This may force you to refactor code blocks to sub-functions. Some profilers use stack-trace sampling as a data-source, therefore they measure run times for whole functions only.How do you deal with warm-up times and changes in workloads while the application Is running?.What if you want to log/print profiling results periodically while still running? Most of the profilers provide a summary output at the end of the run.

The profiling output is way too verbose, again, since every function or code-line is measured.

You don't want to deploy such a profiled application to production as it will affect your processing rate significantly.

Some of the profilers have a significant overhead on runtime since they measure every method and code line (even in sampling mode).

You may need to add extra dependencies, different bootstrapping code, etc.

It is not easy to instrument those tools for running in a production environment.

So why not use widely-available profiling tools like VisualVM / JProfiler / cProfile? I will supply a short (single file, no dependencies) implementation for the profiler for both Kotlin and Python. In this post, I will introduce a simple yet effective approach to do so, which you can even run in production to measure the performance of real-world workloads. All is working well but now you need to optimize it a bit in order to increase the rate of data you can handle. So, you have a batch processing / ETL task that receives some data in a loop or per request and crunches it.